Fabrice Santoro’s Technicolor Dreamshirt Wrests Fashion Victory From U.S. Open Defeat
“I look handsome, I look smart
I am a walking work of art
Such a dazzling shirt of many colors
How I love my shirt of many colors
It was red and yellow and green and brown
And scarlet and black and ocher and peach
And ruby and olive and violet and fawn
And lilac and gold and chocolate and mauve
And cream and crimson and silver and rose
And azure and lemon and russet and grey
And purple and white and pink and orange
And red and yellow and green and brown
Scarlet and black and ocher and peach
And ruby and olive and violet and fawn
And lilac and gold and chocolate and mauve
And cream and crimson and silver and rose
And azure and lemon and russet and grey
And purple and white and pink and orange
And pilot light blue”
The New York Times recently featured an article, only available to Times Select subscribers so I won’t bother to include the link to you amateurs, discussing and somewhat dismissing the style points of the game of tennis. Tonight after watching World War II In Color with my aunt and grandma I switched over to the U.S. Open coverage on Universal HD, and James Blake, a focus of the NYT tennis style feature, was competing against Fabrice Santoro live in the night match. On her way to bed, my aunt’s eyes bugged out at the sight of Fabrice’s shirt. She said in her day tennis players only wore white shirts.
DISCLAIMER: My family is from Connecticut. And so is James Blake. Nevertheless, the NYT began the piece, titled, “Blake Has the Shots, Including Some for the Camera,” with this lead paragraph: “James Blake wore a shirt the same color of blue as a pilot light, creating the feel that he was flickering as he darted from net to baseline in an illumination of his speed.” Evidently the color blue is a bit too much for the fashion empire of America. A tad showy. Let’s not even get into that Blake headband, in matching powder blue with Nike swoop.
The writer of the article, Selena Roberts, probably thought the exaggerated antics of Blake’s second round opponent, Fabrice Santoro, detracted from the purity of the game. Much as she argues that Blake’s acrobatic between-the-legs shots ruin a little bit of tennis, so she says the slam dunk is bad for basketball. I will say here and now that she is wrong, that athletes have taken enough drugs by now to do the superhuman, let them at it, and that obviously sports audiences eat up these special power moves. My quarrel with her reasoning lies not in the obvious, but in how she attaches criticism of Blake’s dress to her argument like nurse sharks to a whale shark.
Who is this woman to criticize a black American, born in New York City, raised in Connecticut, with enough skill to hit balls between his legs clear over a net many feet away? This is the U.S. Open. He can do whatever he wants. Fellow Americans, our country not only lets James Blake and his supporters, the J-Block, rock out whatever headbands they want, we’ll let the French run completely wild like dogs off leashes in our yards. Not only did Fabrice Santoro’s multi-colored dreamshirt silence that bitch Selena, but his on-court antics, like getting his legs iced up mid-game, totally ruined the purity of whatever Selena remembers as “tennis.”
Fabrice not only had another man rub ice all over his legs with his shorts pulled way up to his groin, while the score of the game is tied 15-15, but then he kept hiking up those shorts in the points and games that followed. I would have been totally distracted were it me on the other side of the net. As a spectator, it was all the concentration I could muster to keep an occasional eye on the scoreboard and not at the crotch area of his wet, iced up shorts. James Blake is a tennis saint for beating this man in five sets, or perhaps just a very competitive player and complete heterosexual. In any event, by winning in five sets Blake got the five set monkey off his back after nine five set matches lost. That wasn’t the monkey I was looking at!


